Standardized swallow challenge medium and method of use for esophageal function testing

ABSTRACT

A swallow challenge medium ( 10 ) is thixotropic for easy swallowing and to provide enough viscosity for effective challenge to peristalsis ( 20 ) and has high ionic density for effective impedance measurements by contact with electrodes ( 41–48 ) positioned in a person&#39;s esophagus (E) or oropharynx during swallow testing. The medium ( 10 ) also has a high surface tension so as not to adhere to or coat the electrodes ( 41–48 ) or probe ( 12 ) surfaces. These physical characteristics are stabilized and consistent enough to provide standard for esophageal and/or oropharyngeal function testing and diagnostics.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims priority of U.S. Provisional ApplicationNo. 60/443,356, filed Jan. 29, 2003, which application is incorporatedherein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to assessing esophageal condition. Moreparticularly, the invention relates to an apparatus and method formeasuring the movement of a bolus in the esophagus after swallowing witha swallow challenge medium useful for such measurements.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Accurate measurements of physiological parameters of the esophagus underrealistic swallowing conditions are valuable in diagnosing esophagealdiseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), abnormalfunctioning of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and peristalticmuscular contractions and movements in the esophagus, and the like. Whena person with a healthy esophagus swallows, circular muscles in theesophagus contract. The contractions begin at the upper end of theesophagus and propagate downwardly toward the lower esophageal sphincter(“LES”). These muscular contractions are commonly called peristalticmovements, contractions, or waves, or simply as “peristalsis”. Thefunction of the peristaltic muscle contractions, i.e., to propel foodand drinks through the esophagus to the stomach, is sometimes called themotility function, but is also often used to refer to peristalsis.Therefore, the terms “motility” or “motility function” and “peristalsis”are sometimes used interchangeably.

The LES is normally closed, but it opens momentarily, when a peristalticcontraction approaches it, to admit the bolus of food or drink into thestomach. As a peristaltic contraction passes through each point alongthe esophagus, the esophageal pressure at that point rises to a maximumand then falls back to a base pressure at the relaxed state. Thisperistaltic propagation of the esophageal contraction tends to propelany swallowed volume of mass, which is called a “bolus”, ahead of thepoint of peak pressure and down the esophagus toward the stomach. Themotility function of the esophagus, i.e., the esophagus' ability to movea mass, is dependent on several factors, including the peristalticpressure profile and the characteristics of the esophageal muscles.

Esophageal pressure measurement, or manometry, as well as electricalimpedance have been used to assess motility function of the esophagusand bolus transit dynamics in the esophagus. A typical esophagealmanometer includes an elongated catheter or probe with pressure sensorslocated along its length. The catheter or probe is designed to beinserted into the esophagus, typically reaching the LES and extendinginto the stomach, of a patient, with the pressure sensors positioned atthe LES and at a plurality of other specific points along the length ofthe esophagus at predetermined distances above the LES. During a typicaltest, the patient swallows a specific amount of water with the manometerplaced in the esophagus. The esophageal pressure at the pressure sensorscan be measured and used as an indication of the magnitude and sequenceof the peristaltic contractions. In addition, because the positions ofthe sensors are known, the velocity of the peristaltic motion can alsobe ascertained from the location of the peak pressure as a function oftime. The test can be repeated a number of times to obtain a set ofpressure and velocity values, a statistical analysis of which may beused for diagnostic purposes. For example, according to one protocol,ten 5-ml water swallows are to be performed at approximately 30-secondintervals. The patient's functional response is determined as apercentage of the swallows. For example, a result of such test swallowsmay show that 80% of the swallows were followed by a contractionpressure of 30 mmHg or greater with an onset velocity of about 8 cm/sec,and, therefore, showed normal peristalsis; the remaining 20% of theswallows resulted in a contraction pressure of less than 30 mmHg and,therefore, are deemed to be ineffective peristalsis.

While the conventional manometry (pressure measurements) is useful forassessing certain aspects of the physiology of the esophagus, i.e.,peristaltic muscular activity in the esophagus and LES are detectable aspressure changes, the technique has its limitations in at least tworespects. Esophageal manometry does not measure or predict bolustransit, which is the actual movement of a mass of swallowed materialthrough the esophagus. Esophageal peristalsis generally is triggered bya swallowing action and proceeds whether or not any substance isactually swallowed, and the peristaltic muscular contractions mayproceed regardless of whether the bolus is actually moving through theesophagus. Further, some swallowed material, such as water, will flow bygravity through the esophagus, even if there are no peristaltic muscularcontractions or if they are irregular or erratic. Thus, the meremanometric detection of propagating peristaltic muscular contractions,even if they are properly timed and of normal amplitude (strength), doesnot necessarily mean that any bolus is being propelled by theperistalsis. Thus, incomplete bolus transit may not be detected bymanometry alone. Other substances could be swallowed, such as food, butresulting data, such as impedance, would vary, depending on thecharacteristics of the food or other substances.

Electrical impedance at a plurality of points in the esophagus can beused to detect and monitor movement of a bolus through the esophagus.Essentially, a bolus of water or food will have different electricalimpedance than the non-filled esophagus, so a change in impedance in theesophagus indicates presence of a bolus. Therefore, an elongated probepositioned in the esophagus with a plurality of impedance and/or aciditysensors dispersed along its length can be used to detect and monitor thebolus transit, i.e., the movement of a bolus through the esophagus.Therefore, by combining manometry (pressure measurements) withsimultaneous impedance measurements, both peristalsis and bolus transitcan be quantified, and these measurements, if accurate and dependable,can be combined to determine whether the bolus movement and theperistaltic contractions are in proper synchronization or if there is anabnormal or dysfunctional relationship between them.

Unfortunately, prior to this invention, it was very difficult, if notimpossible, to get consistent, accurate, reliable, and repeatableimpedance measurements, even if the impedance probes, sensors, andmeasuring equipment, itself, was well-designed and in good workingcondition. The problem was that the swallow media available for suchtests were inadequate. For example, water as a medium for swallow testsprovides very little resistance to peristaltic propulsion and is ofteninadequate to cause esophageal abnormalities to manifest themselvesduring the test. Water also has inconsistent ionic content, varying fromone source to another or from one municipal water system to another,which causes variations in impedance measurements and is ofteninsufficient to even make meaningful impedance measurements. Salinesolution has more ionic content, but it provides insufficient resistanceto peristaltic propulsion to cause esophageal abnormalities to bedetected. Water and saline solution also do not remain in a distinct,well-defined bolus mass and, instead, run and spread by gravity throughthe length of the esophagus, bridging many or all of the impedancesensor electrodes so that sensing distinct bolus transit dynamics inrelation to manometric detection of peristalsis is difficult, if notimpossible. Other substances, such as yogurt, mash potatoes, or otherfoods could be swallowed, but resulting data, such as impedance, wouldvary, depending on the physical characteristics of the foods, such asionic content, viscosity, surface tension, and the like. Also, foodstend to coat or stick to the probe and impedance sensor electrodes onthe probe, even after the bolus has passed, which interferes withsubsequent impedance measurements and makes it difficult and oftenimpossible to detect bolus transit in subsequent swallows. These andother deficiencies contribute to erratic, inconsistent, unreliable, andunrepeatable test results.

A state-of-the-art technique for observing and assessing actual bolustransit includes a barium esophagram diagnostic test, in which a patientin front of an X-ray camera performs swallows of a contrast medium thatshows distinctly in an X-ray image. This diagnostic method, however, hasa number of drawbacks as well, including the high cost of equipment andexposure of patients to ionizing radiation, and it is not conducive toambulatory testing. In addition, manometric data synchronized with bolustransit are not available from barium esophagram tests. Suchsynchronized data is often important in assessing the complex physiologyof bolus transit dynamics.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The swallow challenge medium of this invention has a number ofadvantages over traditional substances, e.g., water, saline solution,yogurt, mashed potatoes, and other foods, used for manometer andimpedance testing of esophageal motility functions. To be truly usefulin a broad sense, impedance and manometer (pressure) test results foresophageal motility functions and diagnostics should be consistent,dependable, repeatable, and accurate, not only for effective testing onindividual patients, but also so that reliable standards can bedeveloped and so that individual swallow tests can be compared to suchstandards in a meaningful manner and with a meaningful results. Theswallow challenge medium of this invention provides dependable,controllable, and consistent viscosity, conductivity and impedance, andnon-stick, surface tension characteristics to meet these goals with along enough shelf life to remain dependable, consistent, and reliablefor most ordinary users and uses in esophageal testing. It is alsoingestible, food-grade material that is not harmful to humans.

Generally, according to one aspect of the invention, a swallow challengemedium is provided, which has a viscosity of about 1,000 centipoise toabout 100,000 centipoise at 30 rpm when tested using a BrookfieldViscometer, LVT model, with a number-4 spindle. The medium ispreferably, but not necessarily, thixotropic, exhibiting a decrease inviscosity by, for example, about 20-fold or more, over a two-decadeincrease in the rotation velocity of the viscometer spindle. It providesimpedance of about 300 to 500 ohms, thus has conductivity in the rangeof about 4.5 to 7.6 millisiemens/cm (mS/cm). The medium can also have apH of about 3.5 to about 9.0. The challenge medium includes water, athickening agent such as a polysaccharide in general and carrageenan inparticular, and an ion donor such as sodium chloride. It also includespreservatives such as sodium benzoate. All ingredients are food-grade.

According to another aspect of the invention, the swallow challengemedium also has very high surface tension so that it has a high cohesion(attraction to like molecules) and low adhesion (attraction to unlikemolecules), which makes it substantially non-sticking to the impedancesensor electrode and probe surfaces.

According to another aspect of the invention, a method of measuring thephysiological functions of an organ includes the following steps: (1)introducing a predetermined quantity of a challenge medium into theorgan, (2) selecting a plurality of pairs of locations along a path inthe organ, (3) measuring the impedance between each pair of positions,and (4) determining the location of the challenge medium along the pathas a function of time. The challenge medium can be the challenge mediumdescribed above. The method can also include determining the pressure ata plurality of locations along the path in the organ as a function oftime and comparing the location of the challenge medium along the pathwith pressure along the path as a function of time. The method can alsoinclude repeating the above steps a plurality of times and comparing theresults with a standard.

Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the invention areset forth in part in the description that follows and others will becomeapparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the followingdescription and figures or may be learned by practicing the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part ofthe specification, illustrate the preferred embodiments of the presentinvention, and together with the written description and claims, serveto explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration, in partially cross-sectionedelevation, of a swallow challenge medium used in conjunction with animpedance and manometric probe for assessing motility functions of aperson's esophagus;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of the swallow challenge medium in theesophagus adjacent a pair of electric contacts on the probe incombination with a schematic diagram of simple impedance measuringcircuit;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 1, but showing a bolus of the swallowchallenge medium moved into position adjacent a first pair of impedancesensor electrodes and a pressure sensor on the probe;

FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 and 3, but with the swallowchallenge medium bolus moved to a position immediately above the loweresophageal sphincter (LES);

FIG. 5 is a view similar to FIGS. 1, 3, and 4, but with the swallowchallenge medium bolus moving through the LES from the esophagus intothe stomach;

FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIGS. 1 and 3–5, but illustrating an exampleof an unsuccessful swallow with the swallow challenge medium partiallythrough the LES and partially behind the peristaltic muscle contractionin the esophagus;

FIG. 7 is a graphical illustration of impedance/time and pressure/timeprofiles of a normal swallow in relation to a sensor location on a probepositioned in a person's esophagus; and

FIG. 8 is an example of a 4-channel impedance/time profile of a swallowto illustrate functions of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

A swallow challenge medium 10 of this invention is illustrateddiagrammatically in FIG. 1 positioned in a person's esophagus E alongwith a combination impedance and pressure measuring probe 12 on acatheter 14 for monitoring and/or testing motility function of theesophagus E and bolus transit dynamics through the esophagus E. Uponswallowing the swallow challenge medium 10, it forms a bolus in theperson's esophagus E, and a normal esophageal function includesperistaltic muscular contractions 20 of the esophagus wall 16, asillustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 1, to propel the swallow challengemedium (bolus) 10 through the esophagus E to the person's stomach S. Aswill be explained in more detail below, the swallow challenge medium 10provides a bolus that has optimal characteristics to enhance assessmentof motility functions and malfunctions, including establishments ofstandards and comparison of individual cases to such standards.

One or more pressure sensors 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and/or a plurality ofimpedance sensors 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 on the probe 12 areused to detect and quantify peristalsis and bolus transit dynamics. Thepressure sensors, in general, are more suited for use primarily todetect and quantify peristalsis, and the impedance sensors, in general,are more suited for use primarily to detect and quantify bolus transitdynamics, as will be discussed in more detail below. Therefore, whilethe most advantageous use of the swallow challenge medium 10 of thisinvention is with a probe that has both manometer (pressure) andimpedance sensing functions, it can, of course, also be used with eithera manometer or impedance sensor, separately.

The catheter 14 and probe 12, themselves, are not part of thisinvention, other than as they are used in combination with the swallowchallenge medium 10 according to this invention. Manometer probes forsuch esophageal peristalsis measurements are well-known in the art andare available from a number of manufacturers. The impedance measuringfeatures are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,870, issued to Silny etal., which is incorporated herein by reference. A combination manometerand impedance catheter and probe is available from Sandhill Scientific,Inc., Highlands Ranch, Colo. Therefore, the pressure and impedancemeasuring capabilities of the probe 12 are described herein only to theextent necessary to explain the salient characteristics of the swallowchallenge medium 10 and how it can be used according to this invention.Suffice it to say, therefore, that the example probe 12 illustrated inFIG. 1 is shown with a plurality of individual pressure sensors 31, 32,33, 34, 35 interspersed with a plurality of impedance sensor contacts41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 along a length of the probe section 12 ofthe catheter 14. The pressure sensors 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 are preferablyspaced at known distances apart from each other to facilitatecorrelation of pressures sensed by the sensors 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 tospecific physical locations in the person's esophagus. For example, ifthe pressure sensors 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 are spaced 5 cm apart along thelength of the probe 12, and if the last pressure sensor 35 is positionedin the LES as illustrated in FIG. 1, then it can be assumed thatpressure measurements from the sensors 31, 32, 33, 34 are indicative ofpressures in the esophagus E at 20 cm, 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm,respectively, above the LES. The probe 12 can be positioned in theesophagus E by inserting its distal end 60 and last pressure sensor 35all the way into the stomach S and then pulling it back upwardly untilthe pressure sensor 35 detects the increased pressure that results fromthe pressure sensor 35 being positioned in the lower esophagealsphincter (LES). Of course, other spatial increments or distances canalso be used, and more or fewer pressure sensors can be used, ifdesired. The pressure sensors 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 are connected toappropriate instrumentation, monitor, and display equipment (not shownin FIG. 1), which is also available from manufacturers or suppliers ofthe probes 12 or from other sources known to persons skilled in the art,thus do not need to be described here for an understanding of thisinvention.

The impedance measurements are facilitated by the plurality ofelectrically conductive contacts or sensors 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,48 dispersed spatially along the probe 12. Impedance, which isopposition to flow of electric current, can be measured between any ofthe contacts or sensors 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, as illustrateddiagrammatically in FIG. 2. While any impedance measuringinstrumentation will work, the simple schematic circuit diagram in FIG.2 illustrates the principle. A constant voltage source 50 is connectedacross a pair of the conductive contacts, e.g., contacts or sensorelements 41, 42, to make an electric current “e⁻” flows between thecontacts or sensor elements 41, 42. The current flow can be measured byan ammeter or similar instrumentation 52. According to Ohm's law, themagnitude of the electric current measured at 52 is proportional to theimpedance of the material through which the electric current “e⁻” flowsbetween the contact or sensor elements 41, 42. Therefore, if the swallowchallenge medium 10 of this invention is positioned across the contactor sensor elements 41, 42 of the probe 12, as illustrated in FIG. 2, theelectric current measured at 52 is dependant at least in part on theimpedance of the swallow challenge medium 10. On the other hand, if theswallow challenge medium 10 is not positioned across the two contacts41, 42, then the current measurement at 52 will be inverselyproportional to the impedance of whatever other material through whichthe current has to flow to complete the electric circuit, such as air,esophageal wall tissue, saliva, or whatever. The lower the impedance ofthe material across the contacts 41, 42, the greater the current flowwill be, and vice versa. Some current control or limiting device orcircuitry 54, represented generically as a resistor in FIG. 2, can beused to prevent the flow of too much electric current, which could bumor otherwise injure the tissue. Of course, the FIG. 2 is only schematic,and the actual wires or conductors used to connect the impedance sensors41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 as well as the pressure sensors 31, 32,33, 34, 35 to the instrumentation is routed through the lumen 56 in theprobe 12 and catheter 14 to the exterior of the person's body.

As mentioned above, the primary function of the pressure sensors 31, 32,33, 34, 35 is to detect and monitor the peristaltic muscle contraction20 as it progresses down the esophagus E, ideally to propel the swallowchallenge medium 20 through the esophagus E to the stomach (FIG. 1), andthe primary function of the impedance sensors 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46,47, 48 is to detect and monitor transit of the bolus comprising theswallow challenge medium through the esophagus E to the stomach S. Toillustrate, reference is made first to FIG. 1, in which the focus ofswallow challenge medium 10 is shown positioned in the esophagus E abovethe first pressure sensor 31 and above the first impedance sensor pair41, 42, where it is being propelled toward the stomach by theperistaltic muscle contraction 20. The LES is shown in FIG. 1 contractedaround the probe 12, where the pressure sensor 35 is positioned near thedistal end 60, as explained above. Both the pressure measurements andthe impedance measurements are just background or base levels at thispoint, because both the swallow challenge medium 10 and the peristalticmuscle contraction 20 are still above the pressure sensors 31, 32, 33,34, 35 and the impedance sensors 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 of theprobe 12. Referring now to FIG. 3, where the peristaltic musclecontraction 20 has propelled the swallow challenge medium 10 to aposition surrounding the first pair of impedance sensor contacts 41, 42,and the first pressure sensor 31. Since the swallow challenge medium 10is formulated to have a low impedance, as will be discussed in moredetail below, the flow of electric current e⁻(FIG. 2) increases as soonas both sensors 41, 42 are contacted by the swallow challenge medium 10.Therefore, a decrease in impedance across the sensor contacts 41, 42detected by the impedance detector instrumentation 52 indicates thearrival of the swallow challenge medium 10 at the location of theimpedance sensor pair 41, 42. Meanwhile, as shown in FIG. 3, theperistaltic muscle contraction 20, which follows the swallow challengemedium bolus 10, has not yet reached the location of the first pressuresensor 31, which in the example described above, is about 20 cm abovethe LES. Therefore, while a decrease of impedance across the first pairof sensor contacts 41, 42 indicates the swallow challenge medium 10 hasarrived at the location about 20 cm above the LES, the lack of anysimultaneous increase of pressure at the first pressure sensor 31indicates that the peristaltic muscle contraction has not yet arrived atthe location 20 cm above the LES. When the contraction 20 does arrive atthat position, it will apply its contraction pressure on the pressuresensor 31. Therefore, a pressure increase detected by pressure sensor 31will indicate that the contraction 20 has arrived at that location.

Next the illustration in FIG. 4 shows that the peristaltic musclecontraction 20 has progressed past the first and second pressure sensors31, 32 to a position at or slightly below the third pressure sensor 33,where it has pushed the swallow challenge medium bolus 10 to a positionjust above the LES. This position of the swallow challenge medium 10 isdetected by the last pair of impedance sensor contacts 47, 48 andpossibly by impedance sensor contacts 46, 47, both of which are alsostill in contact with the swallow challenge medium 10 in this position.Also, the movement of the peristaltic muscle contraction 20 to thisposition is, or just was, detected by the third pressure sensor 33.

Finally, as illustrated in FIG. 5, as the peristaltic muscle contraction20 continues to propel the swallow challenge medium 10 toward thestomach S, the passing of the contraction 20 would have been detected bythe fourth pressure sensor 34, and the LES opens momentarily for theswallow challenge medium bolus 10 to enter the stomach S.

All of the peristalsis and bolus transit functions described above arenormal for a healthy esophagus E and LES. However, an important featureof this invention is to facilitate diagnosis of defective ormalfunctioning peristalsis and bolus transit and/or LES malfunctions.One example of this capability is illustrated in FIG. 6, wherein theswallow challenge medium bolus 10 is not transmitted successfullythrough the LES and into the stomach S before the peristaltic musclecontraction reaches the bottom of the esophagus E and terminates thatperistaltic cycle. As illustrated in FIG. 6, there is a condition ofbolus stasis in which a portion of the swallow challenge medium bolus 10is still above the LES as the peristaltic contraction 20 by-passes atleast the upper portion 62 portion of the bolus 10 instead of pushing itthrough the LES and into the stomach S. Therefore, the bolus transit isincomplete. This incomplete bolus transit is detectable by the impedancemeasurements between sensor contacts 47, 48 and/or sensor contacts 46,47 still showing the presence of the swallow challenge medium 10 morethan 5 cm above the LES, while the fourth pressure sensor 34 shows thatthe peristaltic muscle contraction 20 has already progressed to within 5cm of the LES. In other words, this example condition indicates that theperistaltic muscle contraction 20 is not successfully propelling thebolus 10 through the LES and/or the LES is not admitting the bolus 10into the stomach. This and other peristalsis and bolus transit problemscan be detected more reliably and in a repeatable manner with theswallow challenge medium 10 of this invention than with the use ofwater, saline solution, or other bolus materials, as will be explainedin more detail below.

Another example abnormal pattern (not illustrated), which can bedetected is retrograde bolus movement in which the swallow challengemedium or other bolus moves in a reverse direction, upwardly in theesophagus, after the peristaltic wave passes the bolus. Again, thepressure sensors 31–35 would show passage of the peristaltic wave downthe esophagus, while the impedance sensors 41–48 would show the bolusmoving in the opposite direction. These and other abnormal peristalsisand bolus transit patterns can indicate various disease states orconditions, as will be understood by persons skilled in this art.

Typical impedance and pressure measurement profiles at one location onthe probe 12, for example, at the first impedance sensor contacts 41, 42and the first pressure sensor 31 about 20 cm above the LES, are shown inFIG. 7 for normal peristalsis and bolus transit similar to thatillustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 and described above. Prior to the arrivalof the swallow challenge medium bolus 10 at this location, the impedancemeter 52 (FIG. 2) reads a background or base impedance 210 (FIG. 7) fromthe sensor contact pair 41, 42. The background or base impedance 210 isa function of the conductivity and mass of any esophageal wall tissues,air, or other fluids surrounding and between the electrodes 41, 42.Suitable manometer (pressure meter) instrumentation (not shown) readsthe background or base pressure 260 (FIG. 7) during this initial timeperiod.

The person is then instructed to swallow a predetermined amount, forexample 5 ml, of the swallow challenge medium 10, which has anelectrical conductivity that is higher than that of the esophagealtissues and other materials that provide the background or baseimpedance 210 discussed above. A particularly advantageous type ofswallow challenge medium 10 according to this invention is described inmore detail below. As the bolus of the swallowed challenge medium 10advances down the esophagus E and passes the first pair of electrodes41, 42, the impedance between the electrodes begins to drop, asindicated at 220 in FIG. 7, approximately when the bolus 10 reaches theupper electrode, i.e., sensor contact 44. Once the bolus of swallowchallenge medium 10 bridges the upper and lower electrodes 41, 42, asshown in FIG. 2, the impedance 230 (FIG. 7) remains substantially at thelowest level 230 until the tail end of the bolus 10 moves beyond theupper electrode 41. The impedance then begins to increase, as indicatedat 240 (FIG. 7) until the bolus 10 is completely detached from bothelectrodes 41, 42, whereupon the impedance returns to the backgroundlevel 210.

In the meantime, for the pressure sensor 31 located midpoint between thetwo electrodes 41, 42 that give rise to the impedance curve in FIG. 7described above, the background pressure 260 for normal peristalsisprior to and during the time period when the bolus 10 comes into contactwith the electrodes 41, 42, because the muscular contraction 20 (FIG. 2)of the esophagus E propelling the bolus 10 is still upstream from thefirst pressure sensor 31. However, when the muscle contraction 20 passesthe first electrode 41 and approaches the pressure sensor 31, thepressure at the pressure sensor 31 begins to rise, as indicated at 270in FIG. 7, at about the same time as the rising impedance 240 indicatesthe bolus 10 is moving away from that location on the probe 12. Thepressure reaches its peak 280, when the muscle contraction 20 is at thesensor 31 and then returns to the background pressure 260 as the musclecontraction 20 passes beyond the first pressure sensor 31.

Thus, the time profiles of both impedance and pressure, as well as thetiming relationship between the two profiles illustrated in FIG. 7 canbe used to detect abnormalities of the esophageal motility function. Forexample, if the impedance at a particular pair, such as electrodes 41,42, should ever remain at or near the minimum value 230 and not returnto the background level for a prolonged period of time (such as beyondthe time when a pressure peak 280 is detected at that location or whensuch a pressure peak 280 is detected by a subsequent pressure sensor 32,33, or 34 downstream this scenario could be an indication that theperistalsis was ineffective in propelling the bolus 10 past theelectrodes 41, 42.

As discussed above, the timing of the pressure peaks 280 detected at thepressure sensors 31, 32, 33, 34 along the esophagus E can be used tomeasure the velocity of peristaltic propagation of the esophagealmuscular contraction 20. Similarly, the timing of the impedance troughs230 detected at successive electrode pairs 41–42, 42–43, 43–44, 44–45,45–46, 46–47, 47–48 (or fewer of these pairs) can be used to measure thevelocity of bolus transit. For example, a set of four impedance/timeprofiles measured on four impedance channels of a probe 12 derived fromfour electrode pairs 41–42, 43–44, 45–46, 47–48, respectively, in aswallow test is shown in FIG. 8. In this example, the pairs ofelectrodes are spaced apart at a center-to-center distance of 5 cm. Theelectrode pairs are numbered 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively, from theuppermost pair 41–42 to the lowermost pair 47–48. The impedance valuesare labeled, respectively, Z₂, Z₃, Z₄, and Z₅. As seen in FIG. 8, theimpedance trough 310 appears in Z₂ first and progressively later in Z₃(320), Z₄ (330) and Z₅ (340). The time interval 350 between the troughs310, 340 Z₅ and Z₂, i.e., for the bolus 10 to travel the 15 cm from thefirst electrode pair 41–42 and the last electrode pair 47–48, is aboutfive seconds, corresponding to a bolus transit velocity of about 3 cm/s.

The patient can be instructed to perform a predetermined number (such asten) of swallows of the swallow challenge medium 10, with the swallowsspaced apart by a predetermined amount of time (such as about 30seconds). A statistical analysis can then be performed on the data, andthe result compared to a standard to determine whether the esophagealfunctions of the esophagus E are within or outside normal parameters.For example, if a physician finds that five out of ten swallows by apatent fail to achieve complete transit of the swallow challenge mediumbolus 10 to the stomach S, when the standard for a healthy esophagus isno more than three out of ten failed bolus transits for the type of theparticular swallow challenge medium used, that particular patient'sfailure rate may indicate esophageal motility abnormalities. From thelocation of the electrode pair that produced the abnormal impedanceprofile, especially if viewed in relation to the progression of theperistaltic muscle contractions 20 as monitored by the pressure sensors31, 32, 33, 34, 35 as explained above, the approximate location of asuspect region in the esophagus can also be determined. As anotherexample, the bolus transit velocities can also be compared to a standardto assess the condition of the esophagus.

However, comparing the results of the impedance measurements and/orpressure measurements with a standard is only meaningful, where not onlythe test conditions, materials, and equipment are standard, but alsowhere they are designed to bring out or induce a manifestation ofabnormalities that may exist. Test swallows performed with higherviscosity materials provide greater sensitivity to the detection andquantification of abnormal esophageal motility or diseased states.

As described in more detail below, the invention provides a viscousswallow challenge medium 10 with characteristics that satisfy thisrequirement as well as other desirable features for use in such swallowtests for esophageal motility evaluations and diagnostics.

The swallow challenge medium 10 of this invention is substantially moreviscous than water in order to provide a more vigorous swallow test, butwhich can still be swallowed without the aid of a liquid by a personwith a healthy esophagus. More viscosity also provides a more tightlycontained bolus (short length) that keeps the impedance measurements ofthe swallow challenge medium 10 more tightly confined to fewer of theimpedance sensor electrodes 41–48, thus providing more concise boluslocation data at any instant in time. Also, at tighter bolus 10, due toits higher viscosity as well as its higher surface tension, alsoadvances only in response to the propulsive force of the peristalticmuscle contractions. In contrast, water, for example, flows by gravityand fills the entire length of the esophagus, which obscures impedancelocation data and does not challenge the peristaltic muscle contractionsin the esophagus. For example, the swallow challenge medium 10 can havea viscosity of about 1,000 to about 100,000 centipoise at 30 rpm (i.e.,high shear test) using a Brookfield Viscometer, LVT model, with anumber-4 spindle, preferably from about 5,000 to about 50,000centipoise, and more preferably from about 6,000 to about 20,000centipoise for comfortable swallows and at least minimally effectiveimpedance measuring of bolus transit dynamics. It is also preferred thatthe viscosity not vary substantially in the shelf life of the swallowchallenge medium 10, preferably not more than about 15%.

For such viscosity shelf life stability, especially for polysaccharidethickening agents, the pH of the swallow challenge medium 10 should bein the range of 3.5 to 9.0, preferably about 4.0 to 9.0, and morepreferably 4.5 to 8.0. The desired viscosity is largely achieved andcontrollable by including a proper amount of thickening agent andliquid, such as water, in the ingredients. A number of known food-gradethickening agents can be used, including polysaccharides, such ascarrageenan, jells, or hydrojells.

It is also preferred, although not essential, that the swallow challengemedium not only be viscous, but that it also be thixotropic, i.e., thatit has a variable viscosity such that it acts more like a solid (higherviscosity) at low shear and more like a liquid (lower viscosity) at highshear. As mentioned above, a more viscous swallow challenge medium 10provides a more rigorous swallow test that is more likely to inducemanifestation of abnormalities in esophageal motility in fewer swallowtests than, for example, water or saline solution. Also, test swallowsusing water may result in a patient showing a 20% rate of ineffectiveswallow peristalsis, whereas testing the same patient with a viscousswallow challenge medium, e.g., about 90,000 centipoise, may show ahigher rate of swallow failures, such as 40%. In addition, abnormalitiesin esophageal motility may be more pronounced in slower bolus transitvelocity with a more viscous swallow challenge medium 10 than with wateror saline solution, at least in part because a more viscous swallowchallenge medium 10 has to be propelled through the esophagus by theperistaltic muscle contractions 20 (FIGS. 1 and 2–6), whereas water maysimply gravity flow at a high velocity through the esophagus regardlessof the strength or effectiveness or velocity of the peristaltic musclecontractions in the esophagus. However, a constant high viscositymaterial may be difficult for a patient to swallow without gagging orpsychological resistance to even getting it out of the mouth and intothe esophagus. A thixotropic swallow challenge medium 10 alleviates thisproblem by feeling and flowing more like a low viscosity liquid in theinitial swallow process, which is a higher shear condition, and thenbeing more like a high viscosity liquid or solid, once it is in theesophagus where the shear conditions are lower.

Therefore, in addition to having the high shear viscositycharacteristics described above, it is also desirable to have a higherviscosity in low shear conditions. Consequently, a low shear (0.3 rpm onthe same Brookfield viscometer as that described above) viscosityswallow challenge medium in a range of about 50,000 to 800,000 equipoiseis desirable, preferably about 100,000 to 600,000 equipoise, and morepreferably about 300,000 to 500,0000 equipoise. Also, a medium shear(3.0 rpm on the same Brookfield viscometer as that described above)viscosity for the swallow challenge medium may be in a range of about10,000 to 300,000 equipoise, preferably about 50,000 to 200,000equipoise, and more preferably about 80,000 to 100,000 equipoise. Adecrease in viscosity by, for example, about twenty-fold or more over atwo-decade increase in the rotation velocity of the viscometer spindleis a good thixotropic characteristic.

The swallow challenge medium of this invention also preferably has ahigh electrical conductivity in contrast to a substantially lowerconductivity of the tissue lining of the esophagus to enable accurateimpedance measurements with equipment such as that described above andto enable a clear, highly detectable drop in impedance when the swallowchallenge medium 10 moves into contact with the sensor electrodes 41–48.For example, the swallow challenge medium preferably has a conductivityof about 4.5 mS/cm to about 7.6 mS/cm. These electrical conductivitiescan be achieved by a sufficiently high ionic density in the swallowchallenge medium 10, and such high ionic density can be achieved andcontrolled by including a proper amount of any food grade ion donors,such as sodium chloride. The ionic density can be controlled at asufficiently high level so that a relatively small amount, such as 5 ml,of the swallow challenging medium 10 produces adequate amount of changein impedance between a pair of electrodes 41–42, 42–43, 43–44, 44–45,45–46, 46–47, 47–48 (FIGS. 1 and 2–6) when the swallow challenge mediumbolus 10 bridges the electrodes to provide a clear reading or indicationof real time swallow challenge medium bolus 10 position in the esophagusby the impedance detector circuits, as described above. With sufficientionic content to get the conductivity of the swallow challenge mediuminto the preferred 4.5 to 7.6 mS/cm range mentioned above, as little as1 ml. of the swallow challenge medium can be detected with a probe thathas impedance sensor electrodes 41–48 spaced as shown in FIG. 1, i.e.,approximately 2.5 cm apart.

As mentioned above, it is also preferred that the swallow challengemedium has a very high surface tension so that it does not coat andcling to the surfaces of the electrodes 41–48 and/or probe 12 withenough residue to introduce a significant amount of error in thesubsequent impedance measurements. In other words, it is desirable tonot only have a clear reading of the low impedance presence of theswallow challenge medium bolus 10, when it is present at a particularelectrode or contact pair location, as explained above, but it is alsodesirable to have a clear higher impedance reading from those sameelectrode or contact pairs when the swallow challenge medium bolus 10passes that location. Otherwise, not only will the impedance readingsfrom those electrodes not return to base impedance level and indicatewhen the bolus 10 has moved past those electrodes, they may also not beable to indicate when swallow challenge media from subsequent swallowsarrive at those electrodes. Therefore, it is important to not have theswallow challenge medium 10 that leaves a coating or enough residue onthe surfaces of the electrodes 41–48 and probe 12 to bridge pairs ofelectrodes and carry electric current between them after the bolus ofswallow challenge medium has passed. As mentioned above, a high surfacetension in the swallow challenge medium solves this problem. Highsurface tension is characterized by high cohesive strength, i.e.,attraction to like molecules, and low adhesion, i.e., low or negligibleattraction to unlike molecules. Surface tension of a material inrelation to material-to-electrode surface and material-to-probe surface,instead of conventional material-to-air surface tension parameters, isdifficult to quantify directly. However, in this application, thenon-coating property can be quantified indirectly by comparing impedancemeasured across a pair of electrodes before contact with the swallowchallenge medium with impedance measured across the pair of electrodesafter contact with the swallow challenge medium. For example, it can bedone by first measuring the impedance between a pair of the electrodesor contacts, e.g., electrodes 41–42, on the probe 12 in dry air. Second,immerse the probe 12 and electrodes 41–42 in a sample of the swallowchallenge medium and pull it out of the medium. Third, without wipingthe probe 12 or electrodes 41–42, measuring the impedance again acrossthe electrodes 41–42. If the second impedance measurement afterimmersion and withdrawal of the electrodes from the swallow challengemedium samples is substantially the same as the impedance reading beforethe immersion, the indication is that very little, if any, of theswallow challenge medium sample remained on the probe 12 and electrodes41–42, thus did not stick. For example, a drop of 20% or less inimpedance in this kind of test may be considered an indication of anadequate non-stick characteristic, although a drop of 10% or less ispreferred, and a drop of 1% or less is even more preferred.

Healthy esophageal tissue lining has an impedance of about 1,000 to3,000 ohms. Therefore, the swallow challenge medium should at least havean impedance of about 300 to 600 ohms, when it is diluted with saliva,which may be slightly higher than the impedance of the swallow challengemedium itself before it is diluted with saliva from the mouth andesophagus.

For palatability, sweeteners such as sugar or sucralose, and flavoringagents, such as artificial banana, cherry, grape or pineapple flavorscan be included in the swallow challenge medium. Preservatives and moldand yeast inhibitors can also be included to ensure adequate shelf life,for example a year or more. Another attribute of the swallow challengemedium is its non-allergenic property. All ingredients are food-grade.Particularly useful for diabetic patients is the variety in which sugaris replaced with an artificial sweetener, such as sucralose.

An example, a swallow challenge medium can be made by first blending thefollowing ingredients together:

Gelcarin GP 539  1.9 g Potassium citrate monohydrate 0.24 g Sodiumchloride 0.16 g Sodium benzoate 0.15 g Potassium sorbate 0.15 gSucralose 0.02 g Yellow #5 0.001 g 140 g of de-ionized water is then added to the blend with vigorousmixing. The resultant slurry is heated to about 50–100° C., preferablyabout 70° C., to dissolve the solids. While the solution is stirring,0.38 g of banana flavor and 0.22 g citric acid can be dissolved in 7 gof de-ionized water to form an acidified flavoring solution. The heatedsolution can then be removed from the heat, and the acidified flavoringsolution can be added with stirring to disperse it evenly. The mixturecan then be decanted into a suitable vessel and cooled before using.

A swallow challenge medium prepared in this manner was tested forvarious properties. For viscosity measurement, a Brookfield Viscometer,LVT model, with a number-4 spindle was used at three different levels ofshear (spindle velocities). The conductivity and impedance weredetermined by measuring electric current between a pair of electrodes 5cm from each other and submerged in a cylinder of the swallow challengemedium 2 cm in diameter. The pH was also measured. The results arelisted in Table I.

TABLE I Property Value Viscosity (centipoises) 460,000 at spindlevelocity 0.3 rpm  90,000 at spindle velocity 3.0 rpm  13,500 at spindlevelocity 30 rpm  Conductivity (mS/cm) 5.7 Impedance (Ohms) 400 pH 4.5

While a workable swallow challenge medium for some aspects of thisinvention can be within the ranges described above, one aspect of thisinvention is to provide a swallow challenge medium that has sufficientlyconsistent physical properties to be useable as a reliable standardswallow challenge medium, for compilation of reliable and meaningfulstandards for healthy esophageal motility functions, and for meaningfulcomparisons of individual esophageal test results to such standards. Forsuch a standardizable quality, it is desirable to keep the physicalproperties of the swallow challenge medium within 15% of those valuesshown in Table I above, i.e., low shear (Brookfield 0.3 rpm) viscosityof 391,000 to 529,000 centipoises, medium shear (Brookfield 3.0 rpm)viscosity of 76,500 to 103,500 centipoises, high shear (Brookfield 30rpm) viscosity of 11,475 to 15,525 centipoises, conductivity of 4.8 to6.6 mS/cm, impedance of 340 to 460 ohms, and/or pH of 3.8 to 5.2. Theseviscosity measurements are based on the same Brookfield parameters andequipment as described above.

A prototype and three additional samples were also prepared withsubstantially the same recipe as above, but with sugar rather thansucralose. The characteristics are listed in Table II.

TABLE II Low Shear (Spindle Medium Shear High Shear Velocity = (SpindleVelocity = (Spindle Velocity = Sample 0.3 RPM) 3.0 RPM) 30 RPM)Prototype 420,000 98,000 16,000 1 400,000 90,000 13,000 2 420,000 86,00012,000 3 420,000 86,000 11,000The conductivity of the three samples were, respectively, 4.14, 4.15 and4.22 mS/cm. The pH values were, respectively, 4.58, 4.60 and 4.60.

The non-sticking property of a swallow challenge medium prepared in amanner similar to those used in the examples above was measured bymeasuring the impedance between a pair of electrodes on a probe(Sandhill Scientific, Inc., model MII) before and after the electrodeswere immersed four inches deep in the sample swallow challenge medium ina tube of 2.0 cm in diameter without cleaning the probe after removal.The impedance was 11,800 ohms before immersion, 450 ohms duringimmersion, and 11,600 ohms after removal, i.e., a decrease in impedanceof only 0.2% from pre-immersion to post-removal.

It should be noted that the choice of one or more ingredients for oneproperty may affect one or more other properties of the challengemedium. Thus, to produce a challenge medium with a different combinationof desired properties or to substitute one or more ingredients to obtaina challenge medium with the same set of properties may require multipleiterations of adjustment of ratios of ingredients. Such adjustments,however, are within the competence of persons skilled in the art suchthat he/she will be able to achieve the desired alternative propertiesand/or ingredients without undue experimentation. Also, while thedescription above is made with primary references and illustrationsrelating to the esophagus and esophageal peristalsis and bolus transitdynamics, it is also applicable to the oropharynx and diagnostics ofswallow disorders in the oropharynx. Therefore, rather than repeateverything described and claimed herein for the oropharynx andoropharyngeal bolus transit dynamics the descriptions, references, andclaims of this invention in relation to the esophagus are considered toalso include the oropharynx muscular movements and oropharygeal bolustransits during swallowing.

The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as theinvention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalentmanners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of theteachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to thedetails of construction or design herein shown, other than as describedin the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particularembodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all suchvariations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention.Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claimsbelow.

The foregoing description is considered as illustrative of theprinciples of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modificationsand changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is notdesired to limit the invention to the exact construction and processshown and described above. Accordingly, resort may be made to allsuitable modifications and equivalents that fall within the scope of theinvention. The words “comprise,” “comprises,” “comprising,” “include,”“including,” and “includes” when used in this specification are intendedto specify the presence of stated features, integers, components, orsteps, but they do not preclude the presence or addition of one or moreother features, integers, components, steps, or groups thereof.

1. A method of testing peristalsis and bolus transit in a person'sesophagus comprising: positioning a probe comprising a plurality ofelectrodes in longitudinally spaced relation to each other in theperson's esophagus; having the person swallow a swallow challenge mediumthat has viscosity in a range of 1,000 to 100,000 centipoise (highshear), conductivity in the range of 3.8 to 7.6 mS/cm, and sufficientsurface tension to cause the swallow challenge medium to clearsufficiently from surfaces of the electrodes and probe as the swallowchallenge medium passes the electrodes and probe such that impedancemeasurements across the electrodes after the swallow challenge mediumpasses the electrodes is not less than 50% of impedance measurementsacross the electrodes before the challenge medium reaches theelectrodes; measuring impedance across the electrodes on a real timebasis as the challenge medium moves though the esophagus, and recordingthe impedance measurements as a function of time.
 2. The method of claim1, wherein the surface tension is sufficient such that said drop inimpedance is not more than 1%.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein theswallow challenge medium is thixotropic.
 4. The method of claim 1,wherein the swallow challenge medium has conductivity in a range of 4.5to 7.6 mS/cm.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the swallow challengemedium provides impedance in a range of 300 to 600 ohms.
 6. The methodof claim 1, wherein the swallow challenge medium provides impedance in arange of 300 to 500 ohms.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the swallowchallenge medium has pH in a range of 3.5 to 9.0.